On 27/03/2012 18:39, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
I think you misunderstood the intent of the proposal. It's not that I propose a reusable CE element combination which might indeed be a query. I proposed a parameterized sequence of lexical tokens, aka macro. I trust that you know
C and the C preprocessor: I want a macro, not a function.
I completely agree. It's one of the reasons why I've not pushed drools-templates more. Because we also have "dsl" which are just another form of templating. I'd prefer both those ideas where condensed into a proper macro language. But it will take a lot of thought.

Mark

-W



On 27 March 2012 19:07, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org <mailto:mproc...@codehaus.org>> wrote:

    query can somewhat help for re-usable elements, as per "Add CE
    templates".  You can wrap elements in a query and use that inside a
    rule, remember our queries are reactive if you leave off the ?.

    Mark

    On 27/03/2012 10:02, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
    > I've collected a few things I've been moaning about... They are
    > intended to make DRL programming more convenient, given the current
    > set of the Engine's capabilities, i.e., enhance Drools' usability!
    >
    > AFAIK, none of these proposals would break backward compatibility.
    >
    > Cheers
    > Wolfgang
    >
    >
    > On 27/03/2012, Mark Proctor<mproc...@codehaus.org
    <mailto:mproc...@codehaus.org>>  wrote:
    >> I've put up a wiki page to collect thoughts on ideas that would
    involve
    >> breaking backwards compatability in Drools. It's aimed to
    produce ideas
    >> for Drools 6.0.
    >>
    >> No suggestion is too silly, think of it as a brainstorming area for
    >> alternative syntaxes and behaviours to what we have now, so knock
    >> yourself out.
    >> https://community.jboss.org/wiki/BreakingChangesSuggestions
    >>
    >> Mark
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> rules-dev mailing list
    >> rules-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
    >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
    >>
    > _______________________________________________
    > rules-dev mailing list
    > rules-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
    > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

    _______________________________________________
    rules-dev mailing list
    rules-dev@lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org>
    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev




_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

Reply via email to