Ed Staub wrote: > > Do WorkItemHandlers not have access to globals by intent? > In Flow, at least from my perspective, most of the usefulness of globals > would be in WorkItemHandlers. > They'd probably need their own map - or a way of flagging names in the > "variable" map as globals - e.g., "*foo" means "the global foo". > Yes, so it seems. Like already mentioned, accessing globals from within the work item handler might hamper the 'pluggability' requirement of handlers.
One method of reading external data and outputting data would be to use the 'Parameter Mapping' and 'Result Mapping' feature of handlers. I personally haven't used it but I think it is something which might just solve your problem. Peace, /T\ ----- Arguing on the internet is like running at the special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded. -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Access-to-globals-from-WorkItemHandlers-tp732460p732852.html Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
