I thought wrapping a method in a eval statement is effectively allowing you to 
use methods directly, it is syntactic sugar to say this is a method call, 
evaluate it and then use the result in the rete graph.

>From what I understand the problem with methods is drools has to assume that 
>the method always returns the same result given the same set of inputs and has 
>no side effects as it is non-deterministic how many (or few) times the method 
>is called and if the return value changes on different calls then it can 
>really screw things up. When writing beans getters normally follow this rule 
>by convention and necessity, however this is much less likely for arbitrary 
>methods hence why it is good (IMHO) to force the user to consider what they 
>are doing explicitly.

Thomas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:rules-users-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Arjun Dhar
> Sent: 20 April 2011 05:29
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [rules-users] First Order Logic - METHODS in Drools
>
> According to First order Logic, (from a rule perspective), one can
> represent
> their statements using:
> PREDICATES, METHODS, CONNECTORS (including existential quantifiers)
>
> ..while PREDICATES can be synonymous with Object and Object
> expressions; the
> only way of using methods  has been via "eval" (AFAIK, as per my
> outdated
> knowledge); and this is discouraged for the fact that evals perhaps
> dont fit
> in the RETE-OO scheme of things.
> Please note: By methods I dont bean Bean getter/setters; but work horse
> service layer methods.
>
> ..however, to be true to FOL, using methods directly should be
> supported.
> Q1) If it is, can one show or state an example?
> Q2) If not, for METHODS that return a specific type of Object, cant
> they be
> useful in RETE-OO evaluation?
> Q3) I've used "from" for DAO's , conceptually does "from" address this
> fully? In FOL (imo) PREDICATES & METHODS can be exchanged freely, not
> sure
> if "from" gives that freedom.
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/First-
> Order-Logic-METHODS-in-Drools-tp2841531p2841531.html
> Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


**************************************************************************************
This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you have 
received this message in error, please immediately notify the 
[email protected] and delete it from your system as well as any copies. The 
content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by NDS for 
employment and security purposes. To protect the environment please do not 
print this e-mail unless necessary.

NDS Limited. Registered Office: One London Road, Staines, Middlesex, TW18 4EX, 
United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no. 
3080780. VAT no. GB 603 8808 40-00
**************************************************************************************

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Reply via email to