On 20 April 2011 11:17, Arjun Dhar <[email protected]> wrote: > > The reason why i started this thread was to ensure in the process of Rule > engineering, I could write optimal rules in mathematical notion and not > have > to worry about technical differences in how a Predicate is translated while > translation to drools. (ideally) >
:) This idea is not new. You may want to look up Konrad Zuse's<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konrad_Zuse>idea of Plankalkül <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plankalk%C3%BCl>. Mathematics is abstract, computers aren't. -W > > thanks everyone. > > > ----- > Software documentation is like sex: If its good its really really good, if > not then its still better than nothing! > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/First-Order-Logic-METHODS-in-Drools-tp2841531p2842153.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
