You have got to... On 12 December 2011 18:18, ronalbury <[email protected]> wrote: > I see that essentially the same question was asked right before I asked this > one. > > I was expecting that DSL would translate only where there were DSL > translations available and leave the rest untouched. I did not expect it to > be an error if no expansion was available (nor do I understand why that is > the case).
...see this from the reverse angle: people using DSL for the RHS would be very surprised if the failure to expand a misspelled DSLR would not be flagged. Fish or flesh. See the 3rd option I indicated in that other thread. -W > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Problems-with-Domain-Specific-Language-in-eclipse-tp3579963p3580049.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
