Personally - I would rather get an error when I make a mistake (e.g. do not write the DSL correctly) than get get an error for writing perfectly valid code. Eclipse does support a DSL expansion window which allows you to find issues like misspellings. The current approach requires a total commitment to DSL even if you want to use it under rare circumstances.
I did note your suggestion about prefixing with '>', but then my RHS looks different in rule files where I use DSL than it does in files where I do not use DSL (something I would rather avoid). -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/rules-users-Problems-with-Domain-Specific-Language-in-eclipse-tp3579963p3580113.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
