I'm not clear on what you are saying. We reflect the methods of existing beans:-
- If the member has a getter it is available in the LHS - If the member has a setter it is available in the RHS - If the member has a getter and a setter it is available in both the LHS and RHS Members of declared types are available in both the LHS and RHS (as we implicitly create getters and setters). I don't understand "we should only support getters" but "be intelligent enough not to allow the setter to be used in the IDE". If we only support getters there is no setter; and if there is no setter how do we allow the user to set the value? Of course my comments are from a Guvnor perspective, if you mean to change the way declared types work, then... well, we'll have to change Guvnor anyway :) 2011/12/19 Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> > On 19/12/2011 16:04, Michael Anstis wrote: > > You are not mistaken. > > For POJO models we use reflection (class.getMethods) to determine whether > a Type's methods members are available in the LHS or RHS or both, according > to Java Bean conventions. Declarative models have their members available > in both the LHS and RHS by default as we generate "getters" and "setters" > for them. > > It probably looks like we should support only getters though, for existing > beans. We just need to be intelligent enough not to allow the setter to be > used in the IDE. > > Toshiya: Sounds like a great introduction task, you up for the challenge? > > Mark > > > On 19 December 2011 05:47, Toshiya Kobayashi <tkoba...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> In Guvnor 5.3.0, I can use CEP feature support in Guided Rule Editor >> after uploading a class by "Upload POJO Model jar" and annotating it in >> "New Declarable Mode". >> >> 1. | declare TestPojo >> 2. | @role(value = event) >> 3. | end >> >> But if some fields of the POJO class have only getter methods, Guided >> Rule Editor won't list those fields in "Modify constraints" popup. (if a >> field has a setter method, it will be listed) >> >> public class TestPojo { >> private String name; >> public TestPojo() {} >> public String getName() { return name; } >> // public void setName(String name) { this.name = name; } >> } >> >> Am I missing something? If it's not an expected behaviour, I will raise a >> JIRA. >> >> Cheers, >> Toshiya >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing > listrules-users@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users