Thanks for the insight....I was able to figure it out with have the generic rule listen for modifications to a certain property. The problem was that the method being invoked by the other more specific rules was using a convince method to modify the field so I needed to annotate the method with the @Modifies method.
laune wrote > > On 06/06/2012, gboro54 <gboro54@> wrote: >> I am using drools 5.4 and am running into a weird issue with using modify >> keyword. I have have two rules, both are similar in conditions(one rule >> catches 2 additional cases to modify the object with a generic message). >> Weather I add the checks for each rule into the into the generic rule or >> have a condition checking the object for the more specific messages to be >> added, the modify keyword seems to ignore this. In the case where the >> conditions are added to the generic rule independent the activation is >> cancelled. Any thoughts? > > Yes: post more, or nothing at all. > -W > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/modify-keyword-cancels-activation-unexpectedly-tp4017772p4017775.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
