Sorry for that. You are correct more information should have been provided to allow for help. Usually I am better at this but hurried myself a little this morning....
gboro54 wrote > > Thanks for the insight....I was able to figure it out with have the > generic rule listen for modifications to a certain property. The problem > was that the method being invoked by the other more specific rules was > using a convince method to modify the field so I needed to annotate the > method with the @Modifies method. > > > laune wrote >> >> On 06/06/2012, gboro54 <gboro54@> wrote: >>> I am using drools 5.4 and am running into a weird issue with using >>> modify >>> keyword. I have have two rules, both are similar in conditions(one rule >>> catches 2 additional cases to modify the object with a generic message). >>> Weather I add the checks for each rule into the into the generic rule or >>> have a condition checking the object for the more specific messages to >>> be >>> added, the modify keyword seems to ignore this. In the case where the >>> conditions are added to the generic rule independent the activation is >>> cancelled. Any thoughts? >> >> Yes: post more, or nothing at all. >> -W >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> > -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/modify-keyword-cancels-activation-unexpectedly-tp4017772p4017777.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
