Mike,
thanks for taking the time to look into this. This is my observation:
1) Copy Test_R02 from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'
2) Copy Function 'compare_revs' from package 'Test_Package' to package 't1'
3) Build Package
4) Got a 'Success' result.
5) Notice that the following classes appeared in the 'Configuration: Import
Types' text area widget
a) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset'
b) 'com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem.Dataset.NamedReference'
Note: notice the '.' (dot) convention. (Did you import them in this way)?
To show the failure:
1) Remove the above 2 classes from 'Configuration: Import Types' text area
widget.
2) Re-Import them back in as-is (click on the + sign and select the classes)
a) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset
b) com.boeing.irip.model.TcItem$Dataset$NamedReference
Note: Notice the '$' convention.
3) Save work
4) Build package
5) Will get errors
I guess I would have to use (advanced) class name: to 'rename' the classes (or
replace the '$' with '.') in order for a success build????
Thank You,
Tony Nguyen
IPDM Advanced Development
The Boeing Company
714-896-1086
[email protected]
________________________________
From: manstis [via Drools] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 5:04 AM
To: Nguyen, Tony N
Subject: Re: [rules-users] 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873
Hi Tony,
I tested again and it appears fine for me.
I used the BA5_TCModel JAR included in your repository export, with the
following steps:-
1) Create a new package
2) Import POJO Model JAR
3) Re-create rule "Test _Rule01".
4) Validated OK.
5) Package built OK.
I've attached my repository export to the JIRA for your information (package
t1).
It was too big to include in this email (email was pending approval before
posting to mailing list due to it's size... and that, I guess, will never
happen).
With kind regards,
Mike
On 12 June 2012 23:01, Michael Anstis <[hidden
email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4017907&i=0>> wrote:
Sure will do.
On 12 June 2012 22:50, TonyN <[hidden
email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4017907&i=1>> wrote:
Hi,
Latest release 5.4.0 final was supposed to include a fix for an issue that I
reported earlier (#1873). However, I am still seeing the problem....
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1873
Wondering if you can take a look...
thx,
Tony
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4017907&i=2>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[hidden email]</user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4017907&i=3>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
________________________________
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017907.html
To unsubscribe from 5.4.0 Final and issue: GUVNOR-1873, click
here<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4017880&code=dG9ueS5uLm5ndXllbkBib2VpbmcuY29tfDQwMTc4ODB8LTM3MzQzMjM3MQ==>.
NAML<http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
--
View this message in context:
http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/5-4-0-Final-and-issue-GUVNOR-1873-tp4017880p4017915.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com._______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
