Agreed. I think a parallel list for all sub projects of Drools makes sense. >From my side I am mostly interested in Planner so a planner-us...@lists.jboss.org would also be good for me.
On 15 August 2012 10:18, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > >From my point of view, the user list is becoming increasingly cluttered > with Qs regarding Guvnor, which doesn't interest me at all. A parallel list > guvnor-us...@lists.jboss.org might help. > > -W > > > > On 15 August 2012 10:12, Michael Anstis <michael.ans...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Personally, I don't find the user list "high volume". >> >> Perhaps re-categorizing the mailing lists we have works better:- >> >> - users: newbie type stuff >> >> >> - dev (rename drools-tech?): technical questions (not just >> implementation) >> >> My 2c. >> >> On 15 August 2012 00:33, Salaboy <sala...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Probably a linked in private group can do the job, I dont know if it >>> supports all the features that you mention but at least you have the >>> contacts network to checks who joins and post new topics. With a group of >>> moderators the topics can be restricted easily >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On 14 Aug 2012, at 22:48, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: >>> >>> > As the user list is now high volume, i'm contemplating an "invite >>> only" expert list. I'm not sure who this would work, or if it's practical. >>> But the idea is to have a lower volume list, with a higher quality of >>> technical questions and discussions. This might make it easier for people >>> to be engaged. >>> > >>> > I'm thinking of doing it as a google group "drools-expert-group" or >>> something. >>> > >>> > I'm not entirely sure how to decide who gets an invite or not…. as >>> it's very arbitrary. I guess in general anyone who gets a recommendation >>> for someone on the list, gets an invite. But I'm open to other ideas to run >>> this. >>> > >>> > Ideally we should be able to setup a number of moderators, that can >>> handle this invite list, including people from the community. Although not >>> sure if google groups supports this, need to find out. >>> > >>> > Anyway would like to here what people think, and would be interest to >>> see alternative ways to do this. Maybe you can point to existing setups, >>> that manage this sort of situation, that we can copy? >>> > >>> > Mark >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > rules-users mailing list >>> > rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rules-users mailing list >>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> rules-users@lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > rules-users@lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
