On 16/08/2012, Mark Proctor <mproc...@codehaus.org> wrote: > >> +1 to split up the user lists per drools subproject (drools, guvnor, >> planner). It would reduce and focus the volume of each list. > We can look into this for drools 6.0. Because the "guvnor" name, and what it > is, will probably undergo an overhaul.
Guvnor/Planner is becoming a problem *now*. (I just binned 6 out of 8 emails in this morning's mailbox.) Drools 6 will probably require entirely new lists, given that the changes are as hefty and incompatible as one might assume from the proposals. (Personally, I'll NOT stay on a list where Drools 5.0 and 6.0 aren't separated.) -W _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
