JPA is just a wrapper to the marshaller adding transactions and persistence.
Mark On 23 Nov 2012, at 14:18, magnusv <[email protected]> wrote: > Are there any disadvantages to using the Marshaller instead of JPA for > persistence? > > We are running Drools as an embedded service, and we would favor the > Marshaller because we don't want to handle the persisting of the session id > between system reboots. We're currently not using JPA in our system, and it > seems unnecessary to add it just for Drools. > > In which scenarios would it be appropriate to use JPA and Marshalling > respectively? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/JPA-vs-Marshaller-for-session-persistence-tp4020955.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
