JPA for working memory is indeed an entire snapshot of the working memory per transaction. So you want to avoid a transaction per WM insert/update/delete.
Mark On 26 Nov 2012, at 09:57, magnusv <[email protected]> wrote: > Does this mean that the JPA persistence has to write out the entire > knowledgesession every time a new fact is inserted? > > I.e. If I have 279 facts, when I insert fact #280, the JPA will write out > all 280 facts. It has no way of just writing the delta between 279 and 280? > > Thanks > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/JPA-vs-Marshaller-for-session-persistence-tp4020955p4020964.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
