Op 08-02-13 23:27, john poole schreef: > I ran the benchmarker and it's showing that I should be using simulated > annealing. So that's useful info. > > I'm only getting 525-650 for the average calculate count per second though. > (I didn't realize I could get it without the benchmarker until reading the > docs again) > > I'm going through "Score calculation performance tricks" now, but I didn't > see anything about the hardware used for the expected "1000" value. If my > older laptop is sort of crappy( a Pentium(R)2.2GHz), that would explain the > difference, correct? It's still a sign to check if none of the score rules are a bottleneck. The way I do that, is to create a stepLimit benchmark (see docs howto) and then comment out 1 rule at a time to see the impact of adding that rule. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Found-solution-vs-actual-optimum-tp4022027p4022175.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users >
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
