Looks normal, no big bottleneck apparently. It's probably time to blame the hardware :) http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html Mine's around 4k there.
Keep in mind that: better hardware will give you the same solution twice as fast, but not necessarily a much better solution in the same time (which better algorithms do tend to do). Op 12-02-13 00:18, john poole schreef: > I went through and ran some stepLimit benchmarks, commenting out single rules > at a time, or groups of rules that were dependent on each other. "average > calculate count per second" stayed fairly consistent at around 825 to 850, > except for the "consecutive working day" rules.( Which were already in the > drl file before I added mine, but do apply to the schedules I'm working on) > I commented out the group, then uncommented them in sequence. > > Everything below a score is commented out: > > 1487(entire group commented out) > rule "insertEmployeeConsecutiveAssignmentStart" > 1308 > rule "insertEmployeeConsecutiveAssignmentEnd" > 1244 > rule "insertEmployeeWorkSequence" > 1054 > rule "minimumConsecutiveWorkingDays" > 1081 > rule "maximumConsecutiveWorkingDays" > 988 > rule "insertEmployeeFreeSequence" > 994 > rule "insertFirstEmployeeFreeSequence" > 902 > rule "insertLastEmployeeFreeSequence" > 854 > rule "insertEntireEmployeeFreeSequence" > 938 > rule "minimumConsecutiveFreeDays" > 895 > rule "maximumConsecutiveFreeDays" > 851 (nothing commented out) > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Found-solution-vs-actual-optimum-tp4022027p4022223.html > Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
