On 30 May 2013, at 23:36, "Stadin, Benjamin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd be willing to get involved, but since you mention clp to drl only, will > it also be possibly to convert drl to clp? yes. There is already a "DrlDumper" that takes a Rule and dumps it to a string, using a bunch of recursive mvel templates. You can copy/paste this and have it dump to CLP instead. https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/drools-compiler/src/main/java/org/drools/compiler/lang/DrlDumper.java https://github.com/droolsjbpm/drools/blob/master/drools-compiler/src/main/resources/org/drools/compiler/lang/drl.mvel if you change the drl.mvel to a clp.mvel and change the text it outputs, you have yourself a CLP<->DRL translator. The caveat ofcourse is you must keep to the common base level of features between the two systems. > > It could be my imagination only, but I think the possibility to define a > process once for a parent server instance and being able to execute (parts of > the process) temporarily elsewhere, without needing that big parent server > for every piece of logic, is something that is currently missing. I'm confused, what's this to do with DRL and CLP? Mark > > Ben > > Von: Mark Proctor <[email protected]> > Antworten an: Rules Users List <[email protected]> > Datum: Freitag, 31. Mai 2013 00:16 > An: Rules Users List <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: [rules-users] Translate Drools to CLIPS rules > > drools-clips was both a parser and a shell. The parser basically converted > clp fr drl, to then be executed in a shell. There was however no interested > in the project at all, so we discontinued it. > > The parser and converter might be salvageable, if the project is rescoped > simply at a clp to drl translation layer, it might be easier to re-include it > again. I suspect as well a reduced scope in effort, will make it easier for > people to get involved. > > So if anyone wants to give that a go, to rip open drools-clips, get the > parser and translator out, and get it working with 6.0.0.SNAPSHOT. That would > be great :) > > Mark > > > On 30 May 2013, at 21:16, "Stadin, Benjamin" > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm interested in possibilities to convert (one-way) Drools to CLIPS rules. >> I've followed the discussion about the canceled support for the CLIPS parser >> in Drools ("Drools Clips", last reply 2 Feb 2013). However, are there any >> options left to make a one-way conversion? >> >> My interest in this is that I currently do a little research about how to >> fill the gap between central business rule engines and business process >> implementation and execution on smartphones / tablets (iOS, Android, Windows >> Phone 8). Currently I'm under the opinion that good old CLIPS could >> theoretically be a common denominator to enable common rule definition, and >> partial execution of these on mobile devices. >> >> Regards, >> Benjamin Stadin >> _______________________________________________ >> rules-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users > > _______________________________________________ > rules-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
