On 31 May 2013 13:44, Mark Proctor <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On 31 May 2013, at 07:43, Wolfgang Laun <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 31/05/2013, Mark Proctor <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 30 May 2013, at 23:36, "Stadin, Benjamin"
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'd be  willing to get involved, but since you mention clp to drl only,
> >>> will it also be possibly to convert drl to clp?
> >> yes. There is already a "DrlDumper" that takes a Rule and dumps it to a
> >> string, using a bunch of recursive mvel templates.  You can copy/paste
> this
> >> and have it dump to CLP instead.
> > Copy/paste with a whole lot of magic ;-)
> yeah the LHS isn't so had, if they stick to simple patterns, the RHS is a
> whole different kettle of fish :) You can load the RHS into an antlr based
> java.g grammar, and try and translate it - but it wouldn't be fun.
>
> So probably best first to stick to clp->drl, which is more straight
> forward. Besides, once you are on DRL, why would you want to go back to CLP
> :)
>

OP's primary intention seemed to be a DRL to CLP translator, which -
according to your first answer - was classified to be a simple copy/paste
endeavour. Not so.

-W


> Mark
> >
> > Wolfgang
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Reply via email to