I see that the update process is not optimal, but can you tell me if my simple example should work or not?
We get measurements from sensors. Because of network delay and other intermediate processes the timestamp of the measurements can be some seconds behind the time of the insert. In this case the rules with after would not work correctly as well. I am new to drools, so there is a high chance that I make some mistakes. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Fusion-Insert-Events-with-timestamp-in-the-past-tp4029843p4029847.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
