Thanks for your answer. We already use the pseudo-clock for running unit tests, but there might be some other problems:
1. If you do not move forward step by step you can miss the exact times when using negative patterns. e.g. in my example you would need to step forward with AdvanceTiem with about 100ms or 1sec or so. 2. We also use timers, this does not work with the pseudo clock as well, same problem like above. In my understand the example should work, if not I dont see what the @timestamp config is for. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Fusion-Insert-Events-with-timestamp-in-the-past-tp4029843p4029852.html Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
