On Wednesday, 27.05.2015 at 10:42, Justin Cormack wrote: > What is the case for not just having a linker that accepts more > options like -Wl,--rumprun-xen or -Wl,--rumprun-kvm in order to decide > what to do?
>From experience with getting existing software to build on rumprun, it's *really really painful* convincing existing build systems to add arbitrary additional linker flags in the right place. Also, the rumpbake link phase would be the right place to e.g. link in a static root filesystem. This is not something you want to specify as a normal linker flag as part of building the application binary. Martin
