On Wednesday, 27.05.2015 at 12:12, Martin Lucina wrote: > On Wednesday, 27.05.2015 at 09:45, Antti Kantee wrote: > > Does that statement mean that you have working code or you played > > around with it in your head? You read like an academic paper where > > one can never be quite sure if they're describing something that > > works or works on paper ;) > > Working on the code now...
And the `rumpbake' step is done and working. Phew. For those that have been following this long discussion, please see the announcement I just posted as "Heads up: `rumpbake' introduced, toolchain renaming imminent". If you have any last-minute input on the toolchain naming scheme, speak up now! Thanks, Martin
