On 5 June 2015 at 17:07, Martin Lucina <[email protected]> wrote: > Having used the new 'rumpbake' in anger for a week now, I do have a (very > subjective) objection. The new syntax is confusing for me in the same sense > that 'ln' has been confusing for me for the last 20 years, in that I need > to stop and think every time I use it about what the order of the > parameters is. > > So, unless you have some specific attachment to "all your options are > optional", I'd much prefer the old syntax.
I dont think the -T is necessary but the -o would be nice, as it is very confusing - I was expecting the last parameter to be the output one. Justin
