El 26/10/15 a les 23:42, Antti Kantee ha escrit: >> Ah, ok. I was under the impression 6294a7b4410cbc57d78831bcc55e8df4c371d257 >> was that manual pull. > > It was *a* manual pull, not *that* manual pull ... > > (and, like I implied, *that* manual pull is not going to happen unless > someone flags it as strongly needed, else it will wait for the blanket pull. > the good news is that I was considering doing a blanket pull today. the bad > news is that since our testing sucks, it's a lot of manual work to be certain > that the upstream HEAD is healthy enough at an arbitrary timestamp.)
No problem, I can use the patch if I need it. I was only worried it needed to be in a whitelist or something. BR -- Robert Millan
