On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Neeraj Sharma <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Antti Kantee <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 12/06/16 13:20, Neeraj Sharma wrote: >>>> >>>> It's good to provide openssl as an alternative. That said, it would be >>>> nice >>>> if it actually were an actual alternative instead of "one works with some >>>> but not others". So, I'd appreciate some sort of [quick] >>>> analysis/writeup >>>> on why libressl wouldn't work with Erlang, along with reporting the >>>> findings >>>> to the right upstream community. >>>> >>>
As the wise men saying are always true, I invested some time after working Erlang integration with openssl within Rumprun to see whether it builds with libressl. At least the code builds, although I've have to run some tests tonight to complete the story. Having said that the latest Erlang release requires additional crypto, but since we are not going for an upgrade (since its still running in release candidates) so not too worried about it. Well, at least now there is an alternative in rumprun-packages, (that is openssl) for anyone going that path. -Neeraj
