Okay, it would be better to build jar instead of including it. I'll add it to makefile. Thank you for letting me know.
Thanks, Myungho On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Antti Kantee <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18/08/16 12:02, Antti Kantee wrote: > >> It is only headless zero version without X11, font, and sound >>> libraries but >>> you can run java web applications with jetty. I just tested jetty demo >>> application so it may not be stable so don't use in production. >>> >> >> It's been building for a while now -- the hg checkout alone took several >> minutes. I assume it'll be building for a while longer. I'll let you >> know what happens ;) >> > > I managed to repeat your experiment and can confirm that java works! > > Curious, though, why do you supply HelloWorld.jar instead of building it > from source? You need a host jdk anyway for bootstrapping purposes, so I > can't imagine why not. Having it built from source would have saved me > 30min trying to remember the right way to build an executable jar. > Incidentally, the usage of jar is wrong: > > Usage: jar {ctxui}[vfmn0PMe] [jar-file] [manifest-file] [entry-point] [-C > dir] files ... > > You need to give entry-point before jar-file. That one caused a bit of > head-scratching. > >
