On 12/03/14 21:28, Justin Cormack wrote: >> Hmm, actually that will go wrong if you link a static librumpuser into a >> dynamically linked binary. Hmmhmm. > > Well thats a kind of odd thing to do. It just happens to be what the > tests are doing now of course, which is the only reason they work with > a static build. Mixing static and dynamic libs is somewhat > inconsistent. But that is an API change...
I'm not sure if I mind mixing static and dynamic rump kernel libs failing. However, with the current way of things, I think it will fail extremely non-obviously, as in link successfully, but fail to recognize components/modules. That I do mind. At least now things honestly fail to link. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech _______________________________________________ rumpkernel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
