On 12/03/14 22:33, Justin Cormack wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Antti Kantee <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 12/03/14 21:28, Justin Cormack wrote:
>> I'm not sure if I mind mixing static and dynamic rump kernel libs
>> failing. However, with the current way of things, I think it will fail
>> extremely non-obviously, as in link successfully, but fail to recognize
>> components/modules. That I do mind. At least now things honestly fail
>> to link.
>
> Yes I can't immediately think of any way to make it fail correctly in
> that situation.
Hmm, what if rumpuser_dl.c just provided weak aliases for dlinfo() and
dlsym()? I think it could work, at least unless weak aliases now start
shooting us in the foot ("dance, dance!"). Earlier I forgot that the
kernel side of things already should correctly handle components/modules
in the static linking situation due to memories of hacks in an even
earlier situation when it didn't.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/13534_NeoTech
_______________________________________________
rumpkernel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
