On 09/07/14 11:42, Justin Cormack wrote: >> RUMP_THREADS is not a good name. First, RUMPUSER is more correct. I'm >> not sure THREADS is good either. How about MULTITASKING? (or is it too > > hmm, what is wrong with RUMPUSER_THREADS? or _THREADING? its the > choice of thread implementation... specifically to run kernel > threads???
Yea, you're right, probably nothing. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ rumpkernel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
