On 09/07/14 14:01, Justin Cormack wrote: > On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Antti Kantee <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 09/07/14 12:15, Justin Cormack wrote: >>> Any comments on this? >>> >>> The options seem to be >>> 1. export these functions in a saner namespace eg rumpfiber_schedule, >>> rumpfiber_set_sched_hook >>> 2. incorporate the _lwp.c code into here, and export the _lwp >>> functions (in some namespace) >>> 3. Decide what to do later >> >> I think "2" is a good goal, but it requires figuring out how to have the >> NetBSD userspace headers available when building librumpuser. For now >> I'd go for a combination of 1 and 3. We can pretend that the symbols >> aren't really exported, but _lwp.c manages to use them due to some bug ;) > > I guess the question is whether to re-namespace them as rumpfiber_ > then for now or just pretend they are accidental leakage. The > advantage of not changing them for now is its more compatible with > xen...
More compatible == we can use the same _lwp.c? If so, let's pretend. If not, let's not. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ rumpkernel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
