Antti Kantee writes ("Re: [rumpuserxen test] 29376: all pass - PUSHED"):
> On 18/07/14 14:29, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > FYI this included a 64-bit build and test of app-tools and xenstore,
> > so the 64-bit xen.git build with app-tools builds and works (which I
> > didn't previously know...) Thanks, Antti :-).
>
> Something surprisingly working is always nice.
>
> Does the test run anything built with app-tools yet? I'm still working
> on getting my brain to parse the osstest logs. I see a demo-xenstorels
> in osstest.git, but I can't find the counterpart in the build log output.
It turns out that I was wrong and that particular test used an earlier
version of osstest. But my conclusions were still right.
Try this one:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/29383/
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/29383/build-amd64-rumpuserxen/info.html
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/29383/test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64/info.html
In the build job, step 6 has the use of app-tools to build the
relevant subset of xen.git.
In the test job, step 11 is the resulting binary being executed
The output can be seen in the domain console logfile:
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/29383/test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64/moss-bug---var-log-xen-console-guest-xenstorels.log
Ian.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
rumpkernel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
