On 18/07/14 15:33, Ian Jackson wrote: > It turns out that I was wrong and that particular test used an earlier > version of osstest. But my conclusions were still right. > > Try this one: > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/29383/
That's a lot of log, I think I need to get a few extra displays ;) > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/29383/build-amd64-rumpuserxen/info.html > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/29383/test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64/info.html > > In the build job, step 6 has the use of app-tools to build the > relevant subset of xen.git. > > In the test job, step 11 is the resulting binary being executed > The output can be seen in the domain console logfile: > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/29383/test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64/moss-bug---var-log-xen-console-guest-xenstorels.log Very nice. Thanks for sharing. Ah, hint to everyone else, you can click the links on top of the "a lot of log" display for case-specific output. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds _______________________________________________ rumpkernel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
