On 22/07/14 16:33, Justin Cormack wrote:
>> Why is the code in a .h?  Not that it makes functional difference, but
>> it's just ... odd.
>
> Yes I know. Couldn't think of another saner way to not duplicate code and
> to not leave public symbols that should be internal. Suggestions?

I can't currently see any public symbol apart from rumpuser_getrandom(). 
  But if you're referring to the init bit, there are a number of symbols 
in librumpuser in the rumpuser__ (double underscore) namespace that are 
cross-module and internal.

Could of course restrict their visibility at least in shared libs, but 
not sure why worry about conflicts in rumpuser__.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
rumpkernel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users

Reply via email to