On 17/08/14 22:04, Justin Cormack wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Antti Kantee <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 17/08/14 21:11, Justin Cormack wrote: >>> I finally managed to finish putting together an ldscript for >>> rumprun-posix, so there is something that appears to be a C >>> compiler... at present its only for the rumpremote version, although >>> adding the rumprun version would be simple. Its in the ldscript >>> branch. Its not terribly nice... >> >> Cool. Why a branch instead of master? > > Merged it.
great >> Looks like between Xen, baremetal and posix we're getting close to >> having enough examples to produce a generic version of Ian's app-tools. >> Actually, I can't currently imagine more scenarios than the above >> three: "paravirtualized", "raw" and "fully hosted". > > Yes, although there seem to be infinite small variations, and its not > clear how best to configure them. How I think it should work is that there should be some "generic" version in the ``tools'' repo, out of which specific versions are built. I can see at least two axis for variation: component set and configuration parameters (e.g. IP address and mounts, normally handled by rc.d). Not sure how to handle either, yet, but can't be rocket science. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ rumpkernel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
