On 23/09/14 11:19, Martin Lucina wrote:
> Will do and thanks for your work.  This will be a nice experiment for me
> and if I end up needing to port the application to Windows (which may well
> happen later) then I can at least contribute that work back to
> rumpkernel.org.

Do you mean "port to windows" as in "win32" or "cygwin"?  It would be 
interesting to hear about experiences with the former.  You'll need to 
at least add a cdefs_pecoff.h to the NetBSD sources (see sys/cdefs.h) to 
cope with the different object file format that Windows uses.  With the 
build system for win32 you're on your own ;)

When playing around with cygwin, I had some trouble with weak symbols, 
but maybe it was a cygwin toolchain issue, and besides, we've since then 
radically reduced weak symbols in rump kernels (they caused problems 
with e.g. glibc and others), so maybe that problem has just gone away.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
rumpkernel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users

Reply via email to