[email protected] said: > On 23/09/14 11:19, Martin Lucina wrote: > > Will do and thanks for your work. This will be a nice experiment for me > > and if I end up needing to port the application to Windows (which may well > > happen later) then I can at least contribute that work back to > > rumpkernel.org. > > Do you mean "port to windows" as in "win32" or "cygwin"? It would be > interesting to hear about experiences with the former. You'll need to > at least add a cdefs_pecoff.h to the NetBSD sources (see sys/cdefs.h) to > cope with the different object file format that Windows uses. With the > build system for win32 you're on your own ;)
This is all still up in the air but if it happens it'd be the former - native win32. And yes, I anticipate that mucking with the build system / object file format would be the boring bulk of the work. In other news, it took me about a day to port from UDFtoolkit to using the rump kernel UDF implementation, so far so good :-) Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ rumpkernel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
