On 10/11/14 15:36, Justin Cormack wrote:
> Actually I think buildrump with -k should not test whether the compiler can
> build executables that work at all. I added a fudge for OS "none" that
> should go away if that is tested.

That's why I fixed it 20min ago ;)

The whole "target OS" stuff should be separated, it's relevant only for 
builds which target an OS ...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
rumpkernel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users

Reply via email to