On Nov 10, 2014 3:39 PM, "Antti Kantee" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10/11/14 15:36, Justin Cormack wrote: >> >> Actually I think buildrump with -k should not test whether the compiler can >> build executables that work at all. I added a fudge for OS "none" that >> should go away if that is tested. > > > That's why I fixed it 20min ago ;) > > The whole "target OS" stuff should be separated, it's relevant only for builds which target an OS ...
Excellent I had been meaning to but I had to see a man about a dog as we say here... Justin
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ rumpkernel-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users
