[email protected] said:
> I wonder if this mechanism could be used for some or all of the things
> that you're currently using xenstore for.  Specifying which virtual
> block devices to mount where, or what network configuration to use,
> are things that other rump kernel runners would want to do.  Putting
> that information in a stunt /etc seems like it might make more
> commonality.

<brainstorm>
What about embedded platforms with no notion of block devices?

I think that a "key/value store" is a more general abstraction to use.
It works equally well for eg. U-Boot environment variables instead of
xenstore.
</brainstorm>

Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
rumpkernel-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rumpkernel-users

Reply via email to