On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:20 PM, Patrick Walton wrote: > On 8/11/11 7:17 PM, Graydon Hoare wrote: >> I wonder if we can get away with just saying that a *let* declaration >> permits multiplicity, the same way it permits trailing optional >> typarams; if this is truly the important case that's biting. It's >> decidedly less work to support a declarator form: >> >> let x = 1, y = 2; >> >> than to add (even if re-adding) another tycon. > > Should log permit multiple values too? > > I don't see why adding the tycon back introduces so much complexity, to be > honest.
Right, wasn't it just another case in several alts? We should take one for the team of users, who otherwise have to multiply their record declarations beyond necessity if tuples would do. I'm speaking from relative ignorance here, so please be gentle if my many/few summary judgment is wrong. /be _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
