On 12-03-27 11:37 AM, Marijn Haverbeke wrote: > This was all more or less foreshadowed in the discussion of bug #1619 > [2], but (as usual) I took some liberty in the implementation. Comment > here if you feel something should be done differently. If there are no > serious objections, I'd like to remove support for the old for syntax > soon.
>From my perspective: great! Sounds like it all went according to plan :) -Graydon _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
