> One question: does the for loop generate > a return value? Is it just whatever the function itself returns?
Correct. I'm not 100% sure this is desirable yet -- it's more flexible, which is good, but it also means that if you, for example, use vec::all as your iterator, you'll need a semicolon after the loop, or you get a type error. _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
