Makes sense. One counter point though, which I find more persuasive: the
more common case by far is surely a single lifetime parameter and a single
type parameter. In which case Foo<'lt,X> seems less noisy than
Foo{'lt}<X>.
Having said that, Graydon gently invoked BDFL rights to push against using
the curlies. :-) So that ship has presumably sailed.
On 1/31/13 1:37 PM, "Malte Schütze" <malte.schue...@fgms.de> wrote:
>On 01/31/2013 09:58 PM, Dean Thompson wrote:
>> On 1/31/13 12:56 PM, "Malte Schütze" <malte.schue...@fgms.de> wrote:
>>> I really prefer Foo{'lt}<X,Y> over Foo'lt<X,Y> - the former makes it
>>> visually clearer to me where each section of the declaration starts and
>>> ends.
>> The non-curly choice is Foo<'lt,X,Y>. How does that grab you?
>>
>> Dean
>
>I'm worried that it might be confusing to read when it becomes longer.
>Foo<'lt,X,Y> still is readable, but Foo<'lt,'xy,X,Y,Z> isn't anymore.
>Having it in curly braces (Foo{'lt,'xy}<X,Y,Z>) breaks it down in
>smaller parts and makes it easier to understand in my opinion.
>_______________________________________________
>Rust-dev mailing list
>Rust-dev@mozilla.org
>https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
Rust-dev@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
