Hi, Am 02.04.2013 um 22:40 schrieb Jeaye Wilkerson <[email protected]>:
> `let mut` makes more sense to me than `mut` simply because `let` is already a > declarator. mut, to me, is an attribute, not a declarator. I think we should > keep the `let mut` syntax because it's still a `let` (with regard to scope), > but it's mutable. Concise? Eh, it's consistent and predictable. > I like the idea of having a short "let mut", it feels weird to need so many characters for that and it textually aligns badly. So why not go for something else, like "var" if we want that? Cheers, Stefan. _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
