On 05/04/2013 03:55 AM, james wrote:
On 01/05/2013 01:25, Tim Chevalier wrote:
"Please keep unstructured critique to a minimum. If you have solid
ideas you want to experiment with, make a fork and see how it works."
It might be development policy, but it seems to me a terrible idea.
For the record, I consider this a completely sensible policy.
My purpose in the original essay was _not_ to provoke discussion,
particularly about user counts. It was to suggest that reasoning
about individual features based on user count, real or imagined,
is a fundamental error.
I can explain briefly what worked best in the C++ standardization
process, but will not without invitation from the principals.
Nathan Myers
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
