On 04/05/2013 12:49 PM, Nathan Myers wrote:
I can explain briefly what worked best in the C++ standardization process, but will not without invitation from the principals.
I'd be interested in hearing this if it can be made concise, descriptive and constructive. It'd be remarkable to me if no weight was given to the relative frequency of a particular problem / API / idiom when standardizing C++.
-Graydon _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
