On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Lindsey Kuper <[email protected]> wrote: > To start with, there are no rusti tests [3]. This means that even > when it's working, it doesn't stay that way for long; for instance, as > strcat pointed out on IRC today, rusti is more broken now than it was > in the 0.6 release, due to the last LLVM version bump. A `make > check-stage[N]-rusti` build target does exist (and since there are no > tests, it passes with flying colors, with 0 of 0 tests failing). > We'll work on ameliorating this situation.
I wonder if writing something like doctest [1] and using it pervasively in the documentation for examples would be a reasonable approach. .. [1] http://docs.python.org/2/library/doctest.html -- Devin _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
