On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:43 PM, james <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/07/2013 08:37, Graydon Hoare wrote: >> >> I agree that it's higher than it seems it "needs to be". But it will >> always be unnecessary overhead on x64; it really makes no sense there. The >> address space is enormous and it's all lazily committed. > > > I don't think you can rely on 'lazily committed'. Not on a system that is > properly engineered anyway.
You can rely on it, it's the standard behaviour on Linux. The actual consumed memory will be equal to the size of the pages that have been touched. _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
