On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 08:40:27PM -0500, Jason Fager wrote: > Let me ask another way: what's wrong with thinking of ~ just as meaning > "allocate to the heap and subject to move semantics"? When would that > simplification bite me in the ass regarding owned boxes vs strs/vecs?
I don't consider that to be a simplification, really. It sounds about right to me. Of course a `~` pointer is not the only way to have move semantics; any destructor will do. Niko _______________________________________________ Rust-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev
