I'm exploring the tutorial "Rust for Rubyists" at [http://www.rustforrubyists.com/book/book.html], which in fact is not (only) for rubyists, as stated in the introduction. Looks pretty good to me (just my opinion), should definitely be pointed to from the Rust Docs page at [https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Docs], and in good place. As a tutorial, it is in my view far better than the "official" one, and is up-to-date (Rust 0.8), so maybe even just replace it; with a warning note.

The "official" tutorial is not a bad doc in itself (I guess) but is definitely not a _tutorial_: in fact, it requires quite a knowledge of Rust, its fundamental concepts and jargon. "Rust for Rubyists" certainly has room for improvement, but it _is_ for sure a tutorial. I would definitely suggest to start writing a new official tutorial by using "Rust for Rubyists" as raw material. A first pass may be to make it slightly more general, just requiring prior programming experience; Rust definitely is not a language for programming novices, anyway.

Denis

_______________________________________________
Rust-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/rust-dev

Reply via email to